c***@yahoo.com
2007-04-10 14:06:39 UTC
In 2006, I received a small refund from California FTB for
the 2005 state income taxes. In my federal filing for 2005,
I had used schedule A (itemized deductions).
Therefore, normally, the state tax refund would be
considered income for 2006. I have received 1099G, and
normally this would be reported on line 10 of federal 1040.
However, in 2005, I was subject to a huge AMT (and even
huger for 2006 :(). As such, I did NOT get any benefit from
a large chunk of state income tax. I followed pub 525, and
basically, since I did not effectively get a benefit on my
2005 federal taxes filed in 2006, I do not have to report
the amount from 1099G on my 2006 federal taxes on line 10.
OK, that's good.
But where and how do I explain the reason? I do not want IRS
computers going bonkers -- California FTB would tell IRS
computers that I was issued a 1099G, and IRS computers will
not find any entry on line 10 of my 1040. So, some database
comparison, and voila, I would get unwanted letters from
IRS! I know this can be explained at that time, but I would
rather explain it upfront.
So, how do I do it? Do I leave line 10 blank, or do I enter
0.00, which might indicate that a 1099G was issued, uit
includbile amount is zero?
Thanks for your help and suggestions!
<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>
the 2005 state income taxes. In my federal filing for 2005,
I had used schedule A (itemized deductions).
Therefore, normally, the state tax refund would be
considered income for 2006. I have received 1099G, and
normally this would be reported on line 10 of federal 1040.
However, in 2005, I was subject to a huge AMT (and even
huger for 2006 :(). As such, I did NOT get any benefit from
a large chunk of state income tax. I followed pub 525, and
basically, since I did not effectively get a benefit on my
2005 federal taxes filed in 2006, I do not have to report
the amount from 1099G on my 2006 federal taxes on line 10.
OK, that's good.
But where and how do I explain the reason? I do not want IRS
computers going bonkers -- California FTB would tell IRS
computers that I was issued a 1099G, and IRS computers will
not find any entry on line 10 of my 1040. So, some database
comparison, and voila, I would get unwanted letters from
IRS! I know this can be explained at that time, but I would
rather explain it upfront.
So, how do I do it? Do I leave line 10 blank, or do I enter
0.00, which might indicate that a 1099G was issued, uit
includbile amount is zero?
Thanks for your help and suggestions!
<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>